Home: The Annexation Of Hawaii: A Collection Of Document
hawnpac@hawaii.edu
(808) 956-8264
[ Previous Page ] -- [ View PDF ] -- [ View in MS Word ] -- [ Next Page ]
824 HAWAIIAN ISLANDS.
worship of the King as divine. It was affirmed that as a god he could do no wrong, and by a curious
Hawaiian perversion of logical reasoning ho did various things that no one would hesitate to call vile as
well as wrong to prove that he was a god.
It was hoped that the new constitution would give us a change. But largely through various judicial
decisions the royal prerogatives and not the constitutional limitation of Hawaiian sovereignty have
been assigned the supremacy. It has been one series of disappointments after another. The late Queen
was in. England when the constitution of 1887 was promulgated. She was bitterly disappointed at what
her brother had done. Taking advantage of the vexation felt by many in the community at the various
developments of royal prerogative, she sent for R. W. Wilcox: to head a revolution, with the idea that
Kalakaua would be compelled to abdicate and she would be placed upon the throne. But this scheme
failed.
When she became Queen the first act was one to disappoint those who were ready to support a
constitutional monarchial government with a responsible ministry approved by the Legislature. She
claimed the privilege of nominating her own cabinet. The point was yielded, but the Legislature
prorogued January 14,1893, was of such a complexion and so manipulated that there was constant
friction between the Queen's adherents and the supporters of representative constitutional government.
Yet forbearance was exercised again and again; hopes were cherished in spite of convictions to the
contrary from evident tendencies and attempts. These culminated in the transactions of January 10-17,
with which you are familiar from the published statements.
The point to which I wish to call your attention is this, that the political system under which thus far
Hawaiian affairs have been managed is utterly unfitted for the present changed conditions. It answered
fairly well under the Kamehamehas. But the last Kamehameha (though older than his brother
Kamehameha V and passed by in Kamehameha Ill's election of his successor, because of personal
unfitness) was restive under constitutional limitations and arbitrarily set aside the constitution under
which he was appointed. The native element in the population at that time was too dominant an element
to be successfully resisted.
Now, business and commerce have brought to these islands so large a foreign clement that their interests
are virtually the controlling element, politically and socially. But while they are the controlling element,
and that fact can not be gainsaid, there has not ever been, nor is there , now, so far as I am able to judge,
any disposition to do any injustice to the natives. The present movement has been under the management
of those who are and always have been the best friends of the natives, and in seeking to secure and
support their own rights they seek and secure the true rights and the highest interests of the native
population.
The organization of a constitutional government originated in the desire of the chiefs for a more stable tenure
of property titles than simply the pleasure of the sovereign. When attempts to secure from abroad competent
persons for this work bad repeatedly failed, the American missionaries were requested to aid in this work.
Interested in all that concerned the welfare of the Hawaiian people, they consented, but first resigned their
commissions as missionaries of the American Board. They sought no emoluments for themselves nor their
families, and the records of those days show how faithfully, tirelessly, self-sacrificingly they discharged the
duties of their new and responsible positions, which