Home: The Annexation Of Hawaii: A Collection Of Document
[ Previous Page ] -- [ View PDF ] -- [ View in MS Word ] -- [ Next Page ]
3862 labor contracts, and yon certainly do not want that. Yon certainly do not want this section stricken out It would let them all into the United States. The section as amended by the amendment offered by the chairman of the committee [Mr. KNOX] brings the Chinese in that island all under the exclusion act ana prohibits them from coming to the United States from that island. If you add this to the section as amended by the chairman, then it would have force and effect, but you ought not to offer your amendment in lieu of that. Mr. DE ARMOND. It did not seem to me from the reading of the amendment that the proposition I offer would have that effect; but it may have, and in order to obviate that I will offer it as a new provision, a new paragraph. My amendment was drawn for the section as it was before any amendment to it hud been adopted. The CHAIRMAN. Without objection, the amendment will be considered as offered in that way. Mr. KNOX. I did not hear the gentleman's remark. This amendment would leave all the Chinese and Japanese in the island who were there previous to that time. If the gentleman's amendment is to be offered, it should be offered as a new paragraph. Mr. DE ARMOND. I offer it as a new paragraph. The CHAIRMAN. Without objection, that course will be pur-sued. Mr. SNODGRASS. I should like to ask the gentleman a question. You say that all Chinese and Asiatics that have been brought into those islands under contracts shall depart in one year or be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Chinese-exclusion act. What are the provisions of that act? Mr. DE ARMOND. Oh. I have not time to go into that Mr. SNODGRASS. If those people have been brought to those Islands -- Mr. DE ARMOND. I can not yield to the gentleman for a speech in my time, nor could I read the provisions of the Chinese-exclusion act in twice five minutes. Mr. SNODGRASS. I wish to be heard in opposition to the amendment. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Missouri [Mr. DE ARMOND] has the floor. Mr. DE ARMOND. The object of the amendment is to prevent the coining into the United States and to take away from Hawaii those Asiatic laborers who came in under contract - some twenty-five or thirty thousand of them. It is not enough that the amendment offered by the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. KNOX] may exclude them from the United States proper. Whether it does it I can not tell, because I merely heard the amendment as it was read in the confusion of the House; but granting that it does, that, to my mind, is not sufficient. They ought not to remain in Hawaii. The contract system ought not to be maintained there, but they should be deported and should be dealt with in Hawaii, as well as in other parts of the United States, as are Chinese here against the provisions of our law, made, I suppose, for due reason and sufficient cause for the exclusion of the Chinese. 1 would like to have these contract laborers taken out of the Hawaiian Islands as well as prevented from coming to any other part of the United States. The amendment now pending, I think, will have that effect. The CHAIRMAN. The time of the gentleman from Missouri has expired. Mr. KNOX. I ask unanimous consent that the gentleman's time be extended five minutes. Mr. DE ARMOND. I do not care for that much time. I only want a moment. The CHAIRMAN. Without objection, the gentleman will proceed. Mr. DE ARMOND. It will supplement that which the gentleman from Massachusetts sought to accomplish by the amendment offered by him to the section. As I caught the reading of his amendment, I think that the two provisions are in harmony and not at all in conflict. I think it is entirely right to prevent any and all of the Chinamen in the Hawaiian Islands from coming to any other part of the domain of the United States of America and that it is also proper and right and highly desirable to have all of the Chinese who are there under this contract-labor system taken hence as soon as possible. A year is a reasonable time in which to quit our domain without hardship to them. Mr. BARHAM. The gentleman's amendment does not now propose to strike out the other, as I understand it. Mr. DE ARMOND. This is a new proposition. Mr. BARHAM. I should like to have the amendment reported. The CHAIRMAN. Without objection, the amendment will be reported in its present form. The Clerk read as follows: Amend by inserting the following at the end of section 102: "All Chinese and other Asiatics who came or were brought into Hawaii since August 12, 1898, under any contracts or contract whereby they bound themselves, or were or are bound to any term of service, shall depart therefrom and from the United States within one year from the date of the taking; effect of this act, and any such person being in Hawaii or elsewhere in the United States after the expiration of said period shall be dealt with as if found within the United States in violation of the Chinese-exclusion act." Mr. SNODGRASS. Mr. Chairman, the people affected by this provision are poor people. They may not be able to get away at the end of the time mentioned; and I think if that amendment is adopted, there ought to be some provision requiring the persons who brought them into those islands under labor contracts to aid them to get away. If we are going to deal with them thus summarily, we ought to provide some way that they may be carried back. Mr. ROBINSON of Indiana. That is provided for in the Chinese-exclusion act. Mr. SNODGRASS. That is what I wished to ask the gentleman from Missouri when I addressed an inquiry to him. with reference to the provisions of the exclusion act. Is that a provision of that act? Mr. ROBINSON of Indiana. It is. Mr. SNODGRASS. Then I withdraw all opposition to the amendment. The amendment offered by Mr. DE ARMOND was agreed to. Mr. NEWLANDS. I offer the amendment which I send to the Clerk's desk. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Nevada offers an amendment which will be reported by the Clerk. The amendment was read, as follows: Amend section 102 by adding: "That there shall be a commissioner of labor, who shall be appointed by the President of the United States, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, who shall hold his office for four years, unless sooner removed, whose duty shall be to acquire and diffuse among the people of Hawaii useful information on subjects connected with labor, and especially upon its relation to capital, the hours of labor, the earnings of laboring men and women, and the means of promoting their material, social, intellectual, and moral prosperity." It shall be his duty to make annual reports to the governor and legislature of the Territory of Hawaii, and also to the Department of Labor in the United States. The commissioner of labor is also specially charged to inves- tigate the causes of and facts relating to all controversies and disputes between employers and employees as they may occur, and which may tend to interfere with the welfare of the people of Hawaii, and to report thereon to the legislature of Hawaii and to the Department of Labor in the United States. The commissioner of labor shall annually make a report in writing to the governor and legislature of the Territory of Hawaii, as well as to the Department of Labor in the United States, of the information collected and collated by him, and containing such recommendations as he may deem calculated to promote the efficiency of the Department. He shall require such statements as may be prescribed by the Department of Labor in the United States, from all employers of labor, as to the number of laborers employed, the nationality of the laborers, the daily, weekly, and monthly wages paid, and such other information as the Department of Labor may require. Any failure to make such a statement by any person or corporation shall subject such person or corporation to a penalty of $100 for each and every refusal, to be collected and enforced by the government of the Territory of Hawaii in the courts of Hawaii, and to such other additional penalties as may be prescribed by the legislature of the Territory of Hawaii. The legislature of Hawaii may add to the powers and duties of the commissioner of labor as herein prescribed, and may prescribe additional penalties. Mr. NEWLANDS. Mr. Chairman, the purpose of this amendment is to provide for the appointment of an official whose special duty it shall be to inquire into all questions relating to labor in the Hawaiian Islands, to collect and present statistics both to the governor of Hawaii, the legislature of Hawaii, and the Department of Labor at Washington. It provides that this commissioner shall be appointed by the President, for the reason that I deem it unwise that this appointment should be given to the governor of the Territory, or that the labor commissioner should be elected -by the people there. The great danger to Republican institutions in those islands arises from their system of land tenure, which means centralization of land ownership in corporations of large capital, for the plantations are almost universally held and owned by corporations, and from the labor system that has prevailed there. Mr. COX. Will the gentleman allow me to ask him one question there? Mr. NEWLANDS. Yery well. Mr. COX. I could not determine from your amendment what term of office is fixed or the salary? Mr. NEWLANDS. The term is fixed at four years. I have not provided for the salary. This commissioner should be appointed by the President of the United States, because we should see to it that a republican government is maintained there; and the danger to republican government largely arises from the system of labor which the governing class there seek to maintain. Reports are to be made not only to the governor and the legislature of those islands, but to the Department of Labor in the United States, so that his reports to us annually may present all the statistical information. Now. it has been the custom in almost every State in the Union to appoint such commissioners of labor and to organize such departments of labor. They have done great and efficient work. We have a Commissioner of Labor of the United States and a United States Department of Labor, and the work of that department has been most