Home: The Annexation Of Hawaii: A Collection Of Document
[ Previous Page ] -- [ View PDF ] -- [ View in MS Word ] -- [ Next Page ]
3965 I find also, on page 36 of the House bill, that there is the following provision: Prior to each regular election, during the time preserved by law for reg- istration, hare caused his name to be entered on the register of voters for representatives for his district. I do not know what the Hawaiian law is with regard to registration, but if a law should be so constituted, or if the last legislature should have enacted a law by which no persons could vote at the next election unless they were registered previous to the passage of this bill, which would shut out all the people except the sugar planters of that country, upon whom especially the right of suffrage is conferred, this provision ought to be modified so that any person who is registered previous to the next election, or if not registered can qualify by affidavit, shall be allowed to vote, and that there may be no question upon that score. We continue the election laws, generally, of Hawaii. I have not examined them, but I think, with the modifications made in this bill, they are reasonably fair, with the correction with regard to registration. I see the House has also provided that the Federal court appointment shall be for life. It seems to me that provision ought not to be agreed to on the part of the Senate. After a long debate, I believe we changed that provision in the Senate, and insisted that it should be a term, and that the judge could be removed by the President. I simply wish to call the attention of the conferees to these points in the record, as I think the Senate ought to insist upon them. Mr. CULLOM. I do not care to say anything now. I ask for a vote on my motion. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Illinois moves that the Senate nonconcur in the amendment of the House of Representatives and request a conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses. The motion was agreed to. By unanimous consent, the President pro tempore was authorized to appoint the conferees on the part of the Senate; and Mr. CULLOM, Mr. LODGE, and Mr. MORGAN were appointed. Mr. ALLISON. I wish to call attention to the form in which this bill is printed. The original bill is not printed. Mr. TELLER. It is omitted. Mr. ALLISON. It is omitted. I think on the record this copy is attached to the original bill. Mr. CULLOM. The bill as it passed the Senate is in print, and there will be no difficulty in the matter on the part of the conferees. Mr. ALLISON. Is that the original bill on the Senator's desk? Mr. CULLOM. This is the original bill, and here is the print which I got from the House before it was printed here. Mr. PETTIGREW. I should like to ask the Senator from Illinois if the bill is in print exactly as it passed the Senate? Mr. CULLOM. It is, exactly as it passed the Senate. Mr. PETTIGREW. Then there should be a reprint of it, together with the House print. Mr. ALLISON. That should be done. There should be a reprint of the original bill with the amendment of the House. Mr. PETTIGREW. I ask that we may have a reprint of the bill as it passed the Senate, together with the House amendment. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from South Dakota asks that there be a reprint of the Senate bill with the House amendment attached. Mr. CULLOM. I have no objection to that. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Chair hears no objection, and it is so ordered. Mr. CULLOM. I wish to say in justification -- Mr. TELLER. It has always been the custom, so far as I recollect, to have bills printed in that way. I do not understand this new arrangement. We have not the Senate bill here at all now. The amendment should have been printed with a copy of the bill showing what was stricken out and what was substituted by the House. That is the proper way to keep the record. I want to protest against this method of sending bills to us. I do not know whose fault it is. Mr. CULLOM. I wish to say that the proper officer of the Senate came to me with the bill as it passed the House and asked me whether both bills should be printed, and it occurred to me at the time that as we had plenty of copies of the original bill as it passed the Senate it might not be necessary to reprint it, and I told him I thought that would not be necessary. So if there was any fault about it on the part of the Senate it was mine. I want to justify the action of the clerk. Mr. TELLER. It is not a very serious fault, but I do not want to depart from the usual custom of sending bills here that has been in vogue ever since I have been in the Senate, because that is the convenient way. Mr. CULLOM. I presume the Senator means to criticise what was done by the House, and not what was done by the Senate. Mr. TELLER. I do not know whom it is a criticism of, and I do not care. What I want to insist upon is that when a bill goes to the House from this body and is acted upon there, and a substitute bill had been passed by the House, the Senate text and the House text shall come here together as one bill. Mr. ALLISON. And be printed. Mr. TELLER. And be printed. That has been the custom. Mr. CULLOM. I do not think it came in that way. Mr. TELLER. Lines should be drawn through the Senate bill showing that the House had stricken it out, and then let the House bill be printed following it. That is the way the bill should come, so that we may compare the bill of the Senate with the substitute passed by the House. Mr. ALL EN. Mr. President -- Mr. HOAR. I should like to ask the Senator from Nebraska if he rose -with reference to the pending election case? Mr. ALLEN. No, sir; I have been upon the floor for some time on another matter. Mr. HOAR. I wish to address the Senate on the Quay election case, which I understand is now up, and I think I shall occupy not more than two minutes. Mr. ALLEN. I have had recognition here for nearly half an hour, but have yielded to other matters. Mr. HOAR. Perhaps the Senator will allow me a few moments. Mr. ALLEN. I yield to the Senator from Massachusetts.